Triple
T16901741
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | F major |
E424453
|
entity |
| Predicate | flatInKeySignature |
P83458
|
FINISHED |
| Object | B♭ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: B♭ | Statement: [F major, flatInKeySignature, B♭]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: flatInKeySignature Context triple: [F major, flatInKeySignature, B♭]
-
A.
hasKeySignatureDistribution
Indicates that there is a specific pattern or spread of key signatures associated with the entity, describing how frequently or prominently different key signatures occur.
-
B.
hasKeySignature
chosen
Indicates that one musical work, passage, or notation is associated with a specific key signature defining its set of sharps or flats.
-
C.
usesFiguredBassStyle
Indicates that one entity employs the figured bass style as its harmonic or compositional technique in relation to another entity.
-
D.
musicTheoryContext
Indicates that one entity is interpreted or analyzed within the framework, rules, or concepts of music theory in relation to another entity or situation.
-
E.
diatonicScale
Indicates that a musical element (such as a note, chord, or melody) belongs to or is derived from a specific diatonic scale.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889da3e8c8190a2b118f383f0beac |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3c8dc7cf08190ad935935d8daf1d0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b9489408190bcb2ede567ff5bf9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:29 a.m.