Triple

T1689101
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lynch v. Donnelly E36509 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object County of Allegheny v. ACLU E32821 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: County of Allegheny v. ACLU | Statement: [Lynch v. Donnelly, relatedCase, County of Allegheny v. ACLU]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: County of Allegheny v. ACLU
Context triple: [Lynch v. Donnelly, relatedCase, County of Allegheny v. ACLU]
  • A. County of Allegheny v. ACLU chosen
    County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
  • B. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
    Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
  • C. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence
    Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on symbolic protest camping in public parks, clarifying the limits of expressive conduct protections under the First Amendment.
  • D. Eisenstadt v. Baird
    Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
  • E. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886151508819084fa7f1ce6e05577 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aa6296655c8190835ec0d20f7460ca completed March 6, 2026, 5:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad7992792081909af4312ae8a448a2 completed March 8, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.