Triple
T1685990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Form of the Good |
E36441
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationToVirtue |
P12802
|
FINISHED |
| Object | condition for genuine virtue |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: condition for genuine virtue | Statement: [Form of the Good, relationToVirtue, condition for genuine virtue]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationToVirtue Context triple: [Form of the Good, relationToVirtue, condition for genuine virtue]
-
A.
virtue
Indicates that an entity possesses or exemplifies a morally good quality, trait, or behavior.
-
B.
viewsAsVirtue
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards a particular trait, behavior, or quality as a moral virtue.
-
C.
derivesMoralityFrom
Indicates that one entity bases or grounds its moral principles, judgments, or ethical framework on another entity.
-
D.
moralImplication
Indicates that one situation, action, or state of affairs entails or suggests a particular moral judgment, obligation, or ethical consequence.
-
E.
moralTheme
Indicates that a work, event, or situation embodies or conveys a particular ethical lesson, value, or moral principle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886151508819084fa7f1ce6e05577 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf3359ce48190803b322db8ad6027 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61b71cec8190b273588051058ebd |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.