Triple
T1685834
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Euthydemus |
E36438
|
entity |
| Predicate | aimsToCritique |
P31334
|
FINISHED |
| Object | eristic techniques |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: eristic techniques | Statement: [Euthydemus, aimsToCritique, eristic techniques]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: aimsToCritique Context triple: [Euthydemus, aimsToCritique, eristic techniques]
-
A.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
-
B.
hasCriticism
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
-
C.
criticizesSource
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval of, or negative judgment about, the content, behavior, or credibility of another entity that is treated as a source.
-
D.
aimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity intends to clarify, make understandable, or provide an explanation about another entity, concept, or situation.
-
E.
claimsToImprove
Indicates that one entity asserts or promises that it will enhance, benefit, or make another entity better in some way.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886151508819084fa7f1ce6e05577 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf3359ce48190803b322db8ad6027 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61b71cec8190b273588051058ebd |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aaf33347e48190a32b6d0099e3d389 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.