Triple
T16823557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hunt County |
E408957
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Celeste, Texas |
E271446
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Celeste, Texas | Statement: [Hunt County, contains, Celeste, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Celeste, Texas Context triple: [Hunt County, contains, Celeste, Texas]
-
A.
Celeste, Texas
chosen
Celeste, Texas is a small rural town in northeastern Texas known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
-
B.
Tehuacana, Texas
Tehuacana, Texas is a small rural town in Limestone County known for its historic roots and quiet, close-knit community.
-
C.
Cee Vee, Texas
Cee Vee, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Cottle County in the north-central region of the state.
-
D.
La Joya, Texas
La Joya, Texas is a small city in South Texas near the U.S.–Mexico border, known for its proximity to the Rio Grande and its role in the greater McAllen–Edinburg–Mission metropolitan region.
-
E.
Velasco, Texas
Velasco, Texas was a historic Gulf Coast port town that played a key role in early Texas history, including as the site where treaties ending the Texas Revolution were signed.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88394566c8190b3dcbdc72935f7fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b2e838e881908b650194c9b94886 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00b29c170c81908fcc88c31e266ffb |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.