Triple
T16823097
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Angoon |
E408944
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tlingit language |
E9440
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tlingit language | Statement: [Angoon, hasLanguage, Tlingit language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tlingit language Context triple: [Angoon, hasLanguage, Tlingit language]
-
A.
Eyak language
The Eyak language is an extinct Na-Dené language once spoken by the Eyak people of south-central Alaska, now primarily documented through linguistic records and revitalization efforts.
-
B.
Tlingit
chosen
Tlingit is an Indigenous language of the Pacific Northwest Coast, traditionally spoken by the Tlingit people of southeastern Alaska and western Canada.
-
C.
Dena’ina language
The Dena’ina language is an Athabaskan Indigenous language traditionally spoken by the Dena’ina people of south-central Alaska, including the Cook Inlet region.
-
D.
Tutchone language
The Tutchone language is an Indigenous Northern Athabaskan language spoken by the Tutchone people of central Yukon in Canada.
-
E.
Ahtna language
The Ahtna language is an Athabaskan language traditionally spoken by the Ahtna people of south-central Alaska, particularly around the Copper River region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88394566c8190b3dcbdc72935f7fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b2e838e881908b650194c9b94886 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00bb11f8708190ae762a28710e4246 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.