Triple
T16817705
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Appeals Chamber of the ICTY |
E408795
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNoFurtherAppealTo |
P121734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | any higher international court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: any higher international court | Statement: [Appeals Chamber of the ICTY, hasNoFurtherAppealTo, any higher international court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoFurtherAppealTo Context triple: [Appeals Chamber of the ICTY, hasNoFurtherAppealTo, any higher international court]
-
A.
hasEnduringAppeal
Indicates that something continues to attract interest, admiration, or enjoyment over a long period of time.
-
B.
cannotBeAppealed
chosen
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome is final and cannot be challenged or reviewed through an appeal process.
-
C.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
D.
hasFinalDecisionOn
Indicates that one entity holds the ultimate authority or responsibility to make and enforce a conclusive decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
E.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88394566c8190b3dcbdc72935f7fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b2e30cf48190a61936ba0a49df24 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b814b188190aee525f8779203cd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.