Triple
T16809141
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Donoughmore Constitution |
E408560
|
entity |
| Predicate | retainedPowerType |
P38655
|
FINISHED |
| Object | control over defence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: control over defence | Statement: [Donoughmore Constitution, retainedPowerType, control over defence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: retainedPowerType Context triple: [Donoughmore Constitution, retainedPowerType, control over defence]
-
A.
hadPowerType
Indicates that an entity possessed or was associated with a specific type or category of power.
-
B.
maintainsPowerThrough
Indicates that one entity preserves or secures its authority, control, or dominance by means of another entity or specified mechanism.
-
C.
powersType
Indicates that one entity has a specific type or category of power or ability in relation to another entity.
-
D.
hasTypeOfPowerRegulated
Indicates that one entity exercises a specific kind of power or authority that is subject to regulation or control by another entity or governing framework.
-
E.
reservesPowerTo
chosen
Indicates that one party retains or explicitly keeps for itself the authority or right to exercise a particular power or function, rather than granting it to others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88393905081908d00a86b99996ac8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b2ceab608190a9c8cd339ddbea0a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b814b188190aee525f8779203cd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.