Triple

T167717
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts E3052 entity
Predicate inForce P5570 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, inForce, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inForce
Context triple: [Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, inForce, true]
  • A. inForceUntil
    Indicates that a condition, rule, or agreement remains valid and operative up to a specified time or event.
  • B. forceType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of force involved in an interaction or event (e.g., physical, legal, military, or other defined force classifications).
  • C. enteredIntoForce
    Indicates that a law, treaty, agreement, or regulation has become legally effective and binding from a specific point in time.
  • D. inForceForDecades
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, law, or condition) has remained valid, active, or in effect for many decades.
  • E. opposingForce
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively resists, counters, or works against the actions, goals, or influence of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2524ce1e48190ab066bf72859f474 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:26 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a258b58efc8190959c86f73d67b744 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25665f5b8819096ca3e084faf976e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a257101060819094db0f3a3a72f312 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:34 a.m.