Triple
T167696
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives |
E3051
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalContinuitySince |
P3637
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 18th century |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 18th century | Statement: [Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, historicalContinuitySince, 18th century]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalContinuitySince Context triple: [Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, historicalContinuitySince, 18th century]
-
A.
hasHistoricalContext
Indicates that something is related to, influenced by, or best understood in light of specific past events, conditions, or time periods.
-
B.
historicallyExtendedBy
chosen
Indicates that something has been continued, expanded, or carried forward over time by another, later entity or development.
-
C.
historicalOrigin
Indicates the relationship by which one entity serves as the source, origin, or starting point in history for another entity.
-
D.
historicalAssessment
Indicates an evaluation or judgment of something based on its historical context, significance, or development over time.
-
E.
historicallyContestedBy
Indicates that two or more parties have disputed or challenged control, ownership, or interpretation of something over a period of history.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2524ce1e48190ab066bf72859f474 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258b58efc8190959c86f73d67b744 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25665f5b8819096ca3e084faf976e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:34 a.m.