Triple

T1674463
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SNMPv3 E36198 entity
Predicate providesSecurityLevel P3487 FINISHED
Object noAuthNoPriv LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: noAuthNoPriv | Statement: [SNMPv3, providesSecurityLevel, noAuthNoPriv]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesSecurityLevel
Context triple: [SNMPv3, providesSecurityLevel, noAuthNoPriv]
  • A. hasSecurityStandard
    Indicates that an entity complies with, follows, or is governed by a specified security standard or framework.
  • B. protectionLevel
    Indicates the degree or extent to which something is safeguarded against harm, risk, or unauthorized access.
  • C. hasSecurityPresence
    Indicates that some form of security personnel, system, or measures are present at or associated with an entity or location.
  • D. hasSecurityNotion
    Indicates that one entity possesses, defines, or is associated with a particular concept or notion of security in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. securityType chosen
    Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886139ed081909af0940aa9313512 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab272a653481908f48aa1eed5de8a4 completed March 6, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61b2f6288190b2348ef7d7e4672d completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.