Triple
T16648331
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bruce Baldwin |
E404533
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToWalterBurns |
P124118
|
FINISHED |
| Object | romantic rival for Hildy Johnson |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic rival for Hildy Johnson | Statement: [Bruce Baldwin, relationshipToWalterBurns, romantic rival for Hildy Johnson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToWalterBurns Context triple: [Bruce Baldwin, relationshipToWalterBurns, romantic rival for Hildy Johnson]
-
A.
relationshipToJoeBuck
Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that one entity has to the person Joe Buck.
-
B.
relationshipToWalterSobchak
Indicates the specific personal or social relationship that one entity has to Walter Sobchak.
-
C.
relationshipToJoadFamily
Indicates the specific familial or social connection an entity has with members of the Joad family.
-
D.
relationshipWithJaniceSoprano
Indicates that an entity has some form of personal, familial, or significant interpersonal relationship with Janice Soprano.
-
E.
relationshipTypeWithFrankUnderwood
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Frank Underwood.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838a41f08190b0c3f79c47df5078 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e37ad794388190b2817d2ec5ff0de0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e319b1d7f08190b5ecb4a68c636c15 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e326b9e84881909a9166e65bd850d6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:18 a.m.