Triple

T16600037
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heck v. Humphrey E403305 entity
Predicate citationStyle P4468 FINISHED
Object Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) E403305 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) | Statement: [Heck v. Humphrey, citationStyle, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)
Context triple: [Heck v. Humphrey, citationStyle, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)]
  • A. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) chosen
    Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limits when prisoners can seek damages under § 1983 by holding that such claims are barred if success would necessarily imply the invalidity of an outstanding criminal conviction or sentence unless that conviction has been overturned.
  • B. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States
    Humphrey’s Executor v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the president’s power to remove officials of independent regulatory agencies, reinforcing their insulation from direct executive control.
  • C. South Dakota v. Dole
    South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
  • D. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • E. Heien v. North Carolina
    Heien v. North Carolina is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a police officer’s reasonable mistake of law can still provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0075a48c088190b6585e42dcd73705 completed May 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.