Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) | Statement: [West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), officialCitationFormat, West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)]

Target entity: West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)
Context triple: [West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), officialCitationFormat, West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)]

• A. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) chosen
  West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a private physician under contract to provide medical services to state prisoners acts under color of state law for purposes of liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
• B. Atkins v. Virginia
  Atkins v. Virginia is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
• C. Lockett v. Ohio
  Lockett v. Ohio is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded the range of mitigating factors a sentencer must be allowed to consider before imposing the death penalty.
• D. opinion in Atkins v. Virginia
  The opinion in Atkins v. Virginia is a landmark 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
• E. Rochin v. California
  Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: officialCitationFormat
Context triple: [West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), officialCitationFormat, West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)]

• A. legalCitationForm chosen
  Indicates the standardized way in which a legal authority (such as a case, statute, or regulation) should be cited in legal documents.
• B. originalCitationForm
  Indicates the relationship where one form of a cited work is the initial or primary version from which other citation forms or variants are derived.
• C. citationFormatIncludes
  Indicates that a particular citation format specification contains or incorporates a given element, rule, or component as part of its structure.
• D. formerLegalCitation
  Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
• E. usesCitationFormat
  Indicates that one entity applies or follows a specific citation or referencing format defined by another entity.
• F. None of above.