Triple
T16599894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) |
E403303
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | landmark qualified immunity case |
C733
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: landmark qualified immunity case Context triple: [Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), instanceOf, landmark qualified immunity case]
-
A.
landmark case
chosen
A landmark case is a court decision that establishes a significant new legal principle or precedent, often reshaping the interpretation or application of the law.
-
B.
landmark decision
A landmark decision is a court ruling that establishes a significant new legal principle or precedent, often reshaping the interpretation or application of the law.
-
C.
Insular Cases decision
An Insular Cases decision is a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from the early 20th century that determined how the Constitution applies to territories acquired by the United States, distinguishing between "incorporated" and "unincorporated" territories.
-
D.
Third Amendment case
A Third Amendment case is a legal dispute that centers on whether the government has violated the constitutional prohibition against quartering soldiers in private homes without the owner’s consent, particularly in times of peace.
-
E.
Miranda doctrine case
A Miranda doctrine case is a legal case that addresses the application, scope, or interpretation of the constitutional requirement that law enforcement advise individuals of their rights (such as the right to remain silent and to an attorney) before custodial interrogation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.