Triple

T16599340
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject anti-commandeering doctrine E403290 entity
Predicate articulatedIn P519 FINISHED
Object New York v. United States (1992) E13964 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York v. United States (1992) | Statement: [anti-commandeering doctrine, articulatedIn, New York v. United States (1992)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: New York v. United States (1992)
Context triple: [anti-commandeering doctrine, articulatedIn, New York v. United States (1992)]
  • A. New York v. United States (1992) chosen
    New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
  • B. Nebbia v. New York
    Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
  • C. Feiner v. New York
    Feiner v. New York is a 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a disorderly conduct conviction for a street-corner speaker, marking a significant limitation on free speech rights when authorities claim a need to prevent public disorder.
  • D. Apprendi v. New Jersey
    Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • E. New York v. Quarles
    New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e35d74738c81909711654cf38af150 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0084b233ac8190b3f1ab82a47110d4 completed May 10, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.