Triple
T16599031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment |
E403283
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerCaseName |
P65
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association |
E403280
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association | Statement: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, formerCaseName, Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Context triple: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, formerCaseName, Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
-
A.
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
chosen
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association was an earlier federal court case in New Jersey challenging the constitutionality of federal restrictions on state-authorized sports betting, which set the stage for the later Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. NCAA.
-
B.
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
-
C.
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University was a federal civil rights case in which a former Virginia Tech student sued her alleged rapists and the university under the Violence Against Women Act, setting the stage for the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Morrison on the limits of Congress’s Commerce Clause power.
-
D.
Stanford v. Kentucky
Stanford v. Kentucky is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of executing offenders who were 16 or 17 years old at the time of their crimes, a stance later reversed by Roper v. Simmons.
-
E.
Grove City College v. Bell
Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerCaseName Context triple: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, formerCaseName, Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
-
A.
fullCaseName
Indicates that one entity is the complete, formal name of a legal case associated with another entity.
-
B.
formerName
chosen
Indicates that an entity was previously known by a different name in the past.
-
C.
caseNameDerivedFrom
Indicates that the name of a legal case is derived from, or based on, another specified source or entity.
-
D.
caseNumber
Indicates the unique identifying number assigned to a particular legal or administrative case.
-
E.
hasLegalPrecedentName
Indicates that a legal case, decision, or precedent is associated with a specific formal name or citation title.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e35d74738c81909711654cf38af150 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0075a226788190bfad73ffb6b32ec4 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296aabc508190b3836a91b49113ad |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.