Triple
T16598586
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aegis of Athena |
E403272
|
entity |
| Predicate | materialInMyth |
P47718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | goatskin in some accounts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: goatskin in some accounts | Statement: [Aegis of Athena, materialInMyth, goatskin in some accounts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: materialInMyth Context triple: [Aegis of Athena, materialInMyth, goatskin in some accounts]
-
A.
materialInLore
chosen
Indicates that a material is referenced, described, or plays a role within a body of lore or fictional/worldbuilding context.
-
B.
material
Indicates that one entity is physically composed of, made from, or constructed using the substance or material represented by the other entity.
-
C.
materialConcept
Indicates that one entity represents or refers to a material-related concept associated with another entity.
-
D.
materialUsed
Indicates that one entity is made from, incorporates, or utilizes the other entity as its material or substance.
-
E.
materialDepicted
Indicates that a work or representation visually portrays or includes a particular material as part of its subject.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e35d74738c81909711654cf38af150 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296a7d9d0819088555bca6c936e79 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.