Triple

T16586401
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077 E402967 entity
Predicate interpretedIn P2252 FINISHED
Object Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010) E354849 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010) | Statement: [Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077, interpretedIn, Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010)
Context triple: [Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077, interpretedIn, Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 U.S. 393 (2010)]
  • A. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. chosen
    Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the conflict between federal procedural rules and state laws limiting class actions in federal diversity jurisdiction.
  • B. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
    Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held appellate courts must apply an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing district court decisions on attorney’s fees in patent litigation.
  • C. Grovey v. Townsend
    Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
  • D. American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
    American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a California law requiring disclosure of Holocaust-era insurance policies was preempted by the federal government's foreign affairs power.
  • E. Colegrove v. Green
    Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3599cbc448190bc80eef4ad58eb41 completed April 18, 2026, 10:14 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a006ef4f17c819095b3c6f8644b687b completed May 10, 2026, 11:41 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.