Triple
T16585488
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dr. Michael Holt |
E402945
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToAnnaPaul |
P123418
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ex-husband |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ex-husband | Statement: [Dr. Michael Holt, relationshipToAnnaPaul, ex-husband]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToAnnaPaul Context triple: [Dr. Michael Holt, relationshipToAnnaPaul, ex-husband]
-
A.
relationshipToPaul
Indicates a specified type of personal or social relationship that an entity has with Paul.
-
B.
relationshipToAnnaMoore
Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that one entity has to Anna Moore.
-
C.
relationshipToHannah
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Hannah.
-
D.
relationshipToTinaBordereau
Indicates the specific type of personal or professional relationship an entity has with Tina Bordereau.
-
E.
relationshipToJohanna
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has with Johanna.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3599b057881909fcb8bbb156633a8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296a7d9d0819088555bca6c936e79 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e2d7fb02f481908885a226c2191231 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.