Triple

T16574525
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Larmor formula E402674 entity
Predicate generalizedBy P2372 FINISHED
Object Liénard formula for relativistic charges E402674 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Liénard formula for relativistic charges | Statement: [Larmor formula, generalizedBy, Liénard formula for relativistic charges]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Liénard formula for relativistic charges
Context triple: [Larmor formula, generalizedBy, Liénard formula for relativistic charges]
  • A. Larmor theorem in classical electrodynamics
    The Larmor theorem in classical electrodynamics states that a charged particle in a weak, uniform magnetic field behaves as if it were in a rotating reference frame, leading to a characteristic precession of its orbital motion at the Larmor frequency.
  • B. Larmor formula chosen
    The Larmor formula is a fundamental result in classical electrodynamics that gives the power radiated by an accelerating electric charge.
  • C. Einstein–Infeld–Hoffmann equations
    The Einstein–Infeld–Hoffmann equations are post-Newtonian equations of motion in general relativity that describe the dynamics of gravitating bodies with relativistic corrections beyond Newtonian gravity.
  • D. Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED
    Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED is a landmark theoretical result that rigorously demonstrated the mathematical consistency and mutual compatibility of different approaches to quantum electrodynamics.
  • E. Infeld–van der Waerden formalism
    The Infeld–van der Waerden formalism is a mathematical framework in general relativity that reformulates the theory using spinor calculus to describe gravitational and electromagnetic fields.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3595bbbbc8190b023f4872908c031 completed April 18, 2026, 10:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a006eea409c8190808170a0b3f4bd17 completed May 10, 2026, 11:41 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.