Triple
T1655419
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reformed Congregations |
E35786
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnSacraments |
P30951
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Reformed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reformed | Statement: [Reformed Congregations, viewOnSacraments, Reformed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnSacraments Context triple: [Reformed Congregations, viewOnSacraments, Reformed]
-
A.
viewOfCommunion
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or expresses a particular understanding, doctrine, or perspective regarding the practice or theology of communion.
-
B.
viewOnSanctification
Indicates a person's doctrinal or theological stance regarding the process and nature of sanctification.
-
C.
sacramentalUseOf
Indicates the use of something as a sacrament or within a sacramental religious rite or practice.
-
D.
celebratesSacrament
Indicates that an entity performs or participates in a formal religious sacramental rite involving another entity or occasion.
-
E.
recognizesSacrament
Indicates that one entity formally accepts or acknowledges the validity or legitimacy of a particular sacrament associated with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8860568888190a32cd9f70acbba42 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf3359ce48190803b322db8ad6027 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907cff53c8190b424f088478d3e2c |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a99a4c3810819089d2dd0e23c8e46b |
completed | March 5, 2026, 2:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.