Triple

T16454787
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Árpád Bridge E399647 entity
Predicate namedAfter P63 FINISHED
Object Árpád E350608 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Árpád | Statement: [Árpád Bridge, namedAfter, Árpád]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Árpád
Context triple: [Árpád Bridge, namedAfter, Árpád]
  • A. Árpád chosen
    Árpád was the 9th-century chieftain who led the Hungarian tribes into the Carpathian Basin and is traditionally regarded as the founder of the Hungarian state.
  • B. Arpad
    Arpad was an important ancient city-state in northern Syria that served as a major political and military center in the first millennium BCE.
  • C. Géza I of Hungary
    Géza I of Hungary was an 11th-century king of Hungary known for his role in consolidating royal power and navigating internal dynastic conflicts.
  • D. Béla I of Hungary
    Béla I of Hungary was an 11th-century King of Hungary known for consolidating royal power and playing a key role in the kingdom’s early medieval development.
  • E. Géza, Grand Prince of the Hungarians
    Géza, Grand Prince of the Hungarians, was the late 10th-century ruler who consolidated Hungarian power in the Carpathian Basin and initiated the kingdom’s gradual Christianization.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2dac988190b74d6e185fa88ba4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32d7c84fc8190bcb0df96bdec647e completed April 18, 2026, 7:06 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a004f4e31a08190b121d0cfe2a406c2 completed May 10, 2026, 9:26 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.