Triple
T16417569
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nicholas Van Orton |
E398728
|
entity |
| Predicate | finalDecision |
P4339
|
FINISHED |
| Object | declines to restart the game |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: declines to restart the game | Statement: [Nicholas Van Orton, finalDecision, declines to restart the game]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: finalDecision Context triple: [Nicholas Van Orton, finalDecision, declines to restart the game]
-
A.
decidedWith
Indicates that an entity made a decision jointly or in agreement with another entity.
-
B.
decidedIn
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.
-
C.
hasFinalDecisionOn
Indicates that one entity holds the ultimate authority or responsibility to make and enforce a conclusive decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
D.
finalDisposition
chosen
Indicates the ultimate outcome, status, or resolution assigned to an entity after all relevant processes or decisions are complete.
-
E.
decisionHolding
Indicates that an entity has made, issued, or is responsible for a particular formal decision or ruling.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2b9024819085c20e52de95d583 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e328798a488190a5fad01c3c95584c |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e226fe1dd08190865c181721f8c348 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:09 a.m.