Triple
T16397253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cabangan |
E398213
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasElectiveOfficials |
P6491
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mayor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mayor | Statement: [Cabangan, hasElectiveOfficials, mayor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasElectiveOfficials Context triple: [Cabangan, hasElectiveOfficials, mayor]
-
A.
hasElectors
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more electors who have the authority to vote or make a selection on its behalf.
-
B.
hasElectoralAuthority
Indicates that an entity possesses the official power or legal right to oversee, manage, or make binding decisions about electoral processes or outcomes.
-
C.
hasElectedMembers
Indicates that an entity possesses members who have attained their positions through an election process.
-
D.
isElectoralOffice
chosen
Indicates that the referenced position or role is an official public office filled through an electoral process.
-
E.
hasElectoralDignityIn
Indicates that an entity holds or possesses electoral authority, status, or office within a specified political or electoral jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2950248190bc8ad9b9bebdc8c8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e327cb3c708190b64341cb1410ed81 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e226fe1dd08190865c181721f8c348 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:09 a.m.