Triple
T16371428
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles de Lannoy |
E397572
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Habsburg military leader |
C15885
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Habsburg military leader Context triple: [Charles de Lannoy, instanceOf, Habsburg military leader]
-
A.
Austro-Hungarian military officer
An Austro-Hungarian military officer was a commissioned leader in the armed forces of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, responsible for commanding troops, implementing imperial military policy, and upholding the dual monarchy’s authority across its diverse territories.
-
B.
Austrian general
chosen
An Austrian general is a high-ranking military officer from Austria responsible for planning, directing, and overseeing large-scale military operations and strategic defense initiatives.
-
C.
Serbian general
A Serbian general is a high-ranking military officer from Serbia responsible for leading and commanding large military formations, planning operations, and shaping national defense strategy.
-
D.
medieval military leader
A medieval military leader is a high-ranking commander responsible for organizing, directing, and inspiring armed forces in warfare during the Middle Ages, often balancing battlefield tactics with feudal, political, and religious obligations.
-
E.
Slovak military officer
A Slovak military officer is a commissioned member of Slovakia’s armed forces responsible for leading personnel, planning and executing military operations, and upholding national defense and security policies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2778dc8190aa95c7572db127e6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:08 a.m.