Triple
T1635067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NIST SP 800-56A |
E35341
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cryptographic standard |
C9660
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: cryptographic standard Context triple: [NIST SP 800-56A, instanceOf, cryptographic standard]
-
A.
public-key cryptography standard
chosen
A public-key cryptography standard is a formally defined specification that governs how asymmetric key pairs are generated, distributed, and used to securely encrypt, decrypt, sign, and verify digital data.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
C.
cryptographic primitive
A cryptographic primitive is a low-level, well-defined algorithm or protocol (such as a hash function, block cipher, or digital signature scheme) that serves as a basic building block for constructing more complex cryptographic systems and protocols.
-
D.
asymmetric cryptographic algorithm
An asymmetric cryptographic algorithm is a method that uses a mathematically related pair of keys—one public and one private—to enable secure operations such as encryption, decryption, and digital signatures without sharing secret keys.
-
E.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.