Triple

T1633704
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California condor recovery program E35315 entity
Predicate implementsPolicyTool P1652 FINISHED
Object promotion of non-lead ammunition use LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: promotion of non-lead ammunition use | Statement: [California condor recovery program, implementsPolicyTool, promotion of non-lead ammunition use]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: implementsPolicyTool
Context triple: [California condor recovery program, implementsPolicyTool, promotion of non-lead ammunition use]
  • A. implementedPolicy
    Indicates that a particular policy has been put into effect or carried out by an entity.
  • B. policyTool chosen
    Indicates that an entity is a tool, mechanism, or instrument used to design, implement, or enforce a policy.
  • C. usesPolicyModel
    Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or operates according to a particular policy model.
  • D. supportsPolicy
    Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
  • E. hasPolicyGoal
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or aims to achieve, a specific policy objective or target.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a96083e7308190abbf025fe8e43abb completed March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907cac610819083cafd4396b6d66c completed March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.