Triple

T16331605
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Deborah Kara Unger as Christine E396568 entity
Predicate hasAmbiguous P122986 FINISHED
Object motives LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: motives | Statement: [Deborah Kara Unger as Christine, hasAmbiguous, motives]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAmbiguous
Context triple: [Deborah Kara Unger as Christine, hasAmbiguous, motives]
  • A. hasAmbiguousIdentity
    Indicates that an entity’s identity is unclear, uncertain, or can be interpreted in multiple distinct ways.
  • B. hasAmbiguousEnding
    Indicates that the event, story, or situation concludes in a way that is open to multiple interpretations or lacks a clear, definitive resolution.
  • C. isAmbiguousName
    Indicates that a name can refer to multiple distinct entities or interpretations, making its reference unclear without additional context.
  • D. hasUncertainAffinityWith
    Indicates a relationship where the strength, nature, or existence of affinity between two entities is unclear, variable, or not confidently established.
  • E. hasMultiple
    Indicates that an entity is associated with more than one instance or occurrence of another related entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f255b788190a400eba031dd85d8 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2c4dfd9688190a749e48ebc055baf completed April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e226eba9b48190af6e80d3d1c2aed3 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e24555bb6c8190977cf5c5f9149056 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:07 a.m.