Triple
T162976
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jet d'Eau |
E2949
|
entity |
| Predicate | pumpingPower |
P5504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | about 1000 kilowatts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: about 1000 kilowatts | Statement: [Jet d'Eau, pumpingPower, about 1000 kilowatts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pumpingPower Context triple: [Jet d'Eau, pumpingPower, about 1000 kilowatts]
-
A.
hasPower
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
B.
maximumPowerAtPSE
Indicates the highest level of power that can be delivered or drawn at the Power Sourcing Equipment (PSE) in the relationship.
-
C.
fueledBy
Indicates that one entity provides the energy or power source that enables the operation or functioning of another entity.
-
D.
maximumPowerDeliveredToPD
Indicates the highest level of electrical power that can be supplied to the power-drawing device (PD) in this relationship.
-
E.
regainedPowerIn
Indicates that an entity has recovered or reestablished its previous level of power, control, or authority within a specified context or domain.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2524ce1e48190ab066bf72859f474 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2585a1a6481908899ad51211950e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566392208190a538ea9aa1fac53e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a257101060819094db0f3a3a72f312 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:34 a.m.