Triple
T162831
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | W3C Note |
E2946
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConformanceRequirements |
P5499
|
FINISHED |
| Object | none |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: none | Statement: [W3C Note, hasConformanceRequirements, none]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConformanceRequirements Context triple: [W3C Note, hasConformanceRequirements, none]
-
A.
conformsTo
Indicates that one entity complies with, follows, or is in accordance with a specified standard, specification, rule, or guideline.
-
B.
hasCondition
Indicates that an entity possesses, experiences, or is affected by a particular condition or state.
-
C.
hasCheckAndBalanceFunction
Indicates that one entity performs a checking or limiting role on another entity’s powers, providing oversight and balance within a system.
-
D.
hasCheckAndBalanceWith
Indicates that two entities mutually monitor, limit, or counterbalance each other's powers or actions to prevent dominance or abuse.
-
E.
hasLimitation
Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2524ce1e48190ab066bf72859f474 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2585a1a6481908899ad51211950e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566392208190a538ea9aa1fac53e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a257101060819094db0f3a3a72f312 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:34 a.m.