Triple
T162691
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scientific Revolution |
E3320
|
entity |
| Predicate | opposedDoctrine |
P437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | geocentrism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: geocentrism | Statement: [Scientific Revolution, opposedDoctrine, geocentrism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposedDoctrine Context triple: [Scientific Revolution, opposedDoctrine, geocentrism]
-
A.
opposedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
B.
opposingForce
Indicates a relationship where one entity actively resists, counters, or works against the actions, goals, or influence of another entity.
-
C.
foreignPolicyDoctrine
Indicates a state's overarching principles or strategic approach that guide its decisions and behavior in international relations.
-
D.
stateDoctrine
Indicates that a state or government officially endorses, promotes, or is guided by a particular doctrine, ideology, or set of principles.
-
E.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2527757ec819090b8becb2cf1a862 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2585a1a6481908899ad51211950e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256623704819089d9eeefe05858ce |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.