Triple
T16267315
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Michigan Court of Claims |
E394906
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingStatute |
P1051
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Michigan Court of Claims Act |
E394906
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Michigan Court of Claims Act | Statement: [Michigan Court of Claims, governingStatute, Michigan Court of Claims Act]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Michigan Court of Claims Act Context triple: [Michigan Court of Claims, governingStatute, Michigan Court of Claims Act]
-
A.
Michigan Court of Claims
chosen
The Michigan Court of Claims is a specialized state trial court that handles civil lawsuits seeking monetary damages against the State of Michigan and its agencies.
-
B.
Michigan Court System
The Michigan Court System is the statewide judicial branch responsible for interpreting and applying Michigan law through a hierarchy of trial and appellate courts.
-
C.
Michigan Rules of Court
The Michigan Rules of Court are the comprehensive procedural rules that regulate how civil, criminal, and appellate cases are conducted in Michigan’s state courts.
-
D.
Michigan Court of Appeals
The Michigan Court of Appeals is the state's intermediate appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts across Michigan.
-
E.
Michigan v. Tucker
Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f221d8081909b0b2063e7528ba2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e245c963ec8190b059fecac6248cd9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0017bb1d64819080f007656307f58b |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:05 a.m.