Triple
T162497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quebec Act |
E3316
|
entity |
| Predicate | protected |
P1359
|
FINISHED |
| Object | seigneurial landholding system in Quebec |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: seigneurial landholding system in Quebec | Statement: [Quebec Act, protected, seigneurial landholding system in Quebec]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protected Context triple: [Quebec Act, protected, seigneurial landholding system in Quebec]
-
A.
protectedIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity is safeguarded, preserved, or kept safe within the context, environment, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
B.
protectedBy
Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
-
C.
protects
Indicates taking action to keep someone or something safe from harm, danger, or negative effects.
-
D.
protectedCategory
Indicates that one entity is classified under a legally or formally recognized group that is granted special protection from discrimination or adverse treatment.
-
E.
isProtectedBy
Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2527757ec819090b8becb2cf1a862 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2585a1a6481908899ad51211950e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256623704819089d9eeefe05858ce |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.