Triple
T16230804
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | USS Raleigh |
E393973
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleAtBattleOfManilaBay |
P76409
|
FINISHED |
| Object | engaged Spanish naval forces |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: engaged Spanish naval forces | Statement: [USS Raleigh, roleAtBattleOfManilaBay, engaged Spanish naval forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleAtBattleOfManilaBay Context triple: [USS Raleigh, roleAtBattleOfManilaBay, engaged Spanish naval forces]
-
A.
roleAtLeyteGulf
Indicates the specific role or function an entity performed in the context of the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
-
B.
resultOfCommandAtManilaBay
Indicates that something occurs as a consequence of the command issued at the Battle of Manila Bay.
-
C.
roleInSpanishAmericanWar
chosen
Indicates the specific function, position, or involvement an entity had in the events or activities of the Spanish–American War.
-
D.
roleAtBattleOfIquique
Indicates the specific role or function an entity held during the Battle of Iquique.
-
E.
commandingOfficerAtBattleOfIquique
Indicates that one entity served as the commanding officer of the other entity during the Battle of Iquique.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f204df88190a8f88923decf9835 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e23d29438c81909aa2724cc47bb959 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219e94a448190b73a4e6aa374eb4a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.