Triple
T16230346
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pseudoryx |
E393960
|
entity |
| Predicate | conservationStatusOfGenusFlagship |
P1339
|
FINISHED |
| Object | critically endangered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: critically endangered | Statement: [Pseudoryx, conservationStatusOfGenusFlagship, critically endangered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conservationStatusOfGenusFlagship Context triple: [Pseudoryx, conservationStatusOfGenusFlagship, critically endangered]
-
A.
conservationStatus
chosen
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
-
B.
wildlifeProtectionStatus
Indicates the level or type of legal or conservation protection currently applied to wildlife.
-
C.
hasConservationConcernIn
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
-
D.
typeOfConservation
Indicates the specific kind or category of conservation practice, method, or approach that applies to an entity or situation.
-
E.
hasConservationPriority
Indicates that an entity is assigned a particular level or status of importance for conservation or protection efforts.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f204df88190a8f88923decf9835 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e23d29438c81909aa2724cc47bb959 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219e94a448190b73a4e6aa374eb4a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.