Triple
T16226870
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Morgan County, Alabama |
E393871
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eva, Alabama |
E698514
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eva, Alabama | Statement: [Morgan County, Alabama, hasTown, Eva, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eva, Alabama Context triple: [Morgan County, Alabama, hasTown, Eva, Alabama]
-
A.
Eva, Alabama
chosen
Eva, Alabama is a small rural town in north-central Alabama known for its close-knit community and location within Morgan County.
-
B.
Waverly, Alabama
Waverly, Alabama is a small rural town in eastern Alabama known for its tight-knit community and historic Southern character.
-
C.
Vincent, Alabama
Vincent, Alabama is a small town in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within the Birmingham–Hoover metropolitan area.
-
D.
McCalla, Alabama
McCalla, Alabama is an unincorporated community in Jefferson and Tuscaloosa counties known for its suburban character and proximity to Birmingham and historic sites like Tannehill Ironworks.
-
E.
Eldridge, Alabama
Eldridge, Alabama is a small rural town located in Walker County in the northwestern part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f204df88190a8f88923decf9835 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e23d26b02c819080b70ab7cc3bcc24 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00079c4184819091d3355a5afaeced |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.