Triple
T1621178
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GitHub Pages |
E35034
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsServerSideCode |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | false |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [GitHub Pages, supportsServerSideCode, false]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsServerSideCode Context triple: [GitHub Pages, supportsServerSideCode, false]
-
A.
supportsOperationsIn
Indicates that one entity enables, facilitates, or backs the execution of operations within a specified context, area, or domain of another entity.
-
B.
supportsDatastoreType
Indicates that one entity is capable of working with, handling, or being compatible with a specified type of datastore.
-
C.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
canBeImplementedWith
Indicates that one entity is capable of being realized, executed, or fulfilled through the use or application of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886023194819080a3fccd6e325d0e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf4a0ef748190ae52b9656474c0ef |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907c731808190a1d998155041b3c1 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.