Triple

T16205756
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject October Term 2013 E393323 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community E953177 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community]
  • A. Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community chosen
    Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the scope of tribal sovereign immunity in the context of a Native American tribe’s off-reservation commercial gaming activities.
  • B. Bay Mills Indian Community Tribal Court
    The Bay Mills Indian Community Tribal Court is the judicial body of the Bay Mills Indian Community that handles legal matters and enforces tribal laws within its jurisdiction.
  • C. Michigan v. Doran
    Michigan v. Doran is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limited role of asylum states in reviewing extradition requests from other states under the Extradition Clause and federal statute.
  • D. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
    Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering using the federal form.
  • E. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
    Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2270f047c819084645da27759a3d2 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a00078fa2ac8190a0a2cf38bc41498d completed May 10, 2026, 4:20 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.