Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Michigan state courts | Statement: [Michigan Appellate Reports, isPrecedentIn, Michigan state courts]

Target entity: Michigan state courts
Context triple: [Michigan Appellate Reports, isPrecedentIn, Michigan state courts]

• A. Michigan Court System chosen
  The Michigan Court System is the statewide judicial branch responsible for interpreting and applying Michigan law through a hierarchy of trial and appellate courts.
• B. Michigan trial courts
  Michigan trial courts are the state’s lower-level courts of general and limited jurisdiction that handle initial proceedings in criminal, civil, family, and other local legal matters.
• C. Indiana superior courts
  Indiana superior courts are state trial courts of general jurisdiction that handle a wide range of civil and criminal cases across Indiana’s counties.
• D. Michigan Municipal Courts
  Michigan Municipal Courts are local-level judicial bodies in Michigan that handle minor criminal offenses, traffic violations, and certain civil matters within their municipal jurisdictions.
• E. Michigan Rules of Court
  The Michigan Rules of Court are the comprehensive procedural rules that regulate how civil, criminal, and appellate cases are conducted in Michigan’s state courts.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: isPrecedentIn
Context triple: [Michigan Appellate Reports, isPrecedentIn, Michigan state courts]

• A. hasCourtPrecedence
  Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
• B. precedentFor chosen
  Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
• C. hasPrecedentialStatus
  Indicates that one legal decision or authority possesses a recognized level of precedential force or binding effect relative to others.
• D. precedentInterpreted
  Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
• E. legalPrecedentInvolved
  Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
• F. None of above.