Triple

T16115237
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject October Term 2011 E390985 entity
Predicate heardCase P75119 FINISHED
Object Missouri v. Frye
Missouri v. Frye is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defense counsel has a duty to communicate formal plea offers to a criminal defendant as part of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
 E1194033 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Missouri v. Frye | Statement: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Missouri v. Frye]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Missouri v. Frye
Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Missouri v. Frye]
  • A. Missouri v. Seibert
    Missouri v. Seibert is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited police use of "question-first, warn-later" interrogation tactics by strengthening Miranda protections for suspects.
  • B. Missouri v. McNeely
    Missouri v. McNeely is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourth Amendment generally requires a warrant for nonconsensual blood draws in drunk-driving investigations, rejecting a per se rule based on the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream.
  • C. Cummings v. Missouri
    Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
  • D. Adair v. United States
    Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
  • E. Moore v. Illinois
    Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Missouri v. Frye
Triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Missouri v. Frye]
Generated description
Missouri v. Frye is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defense counsel has a duty to communicate formal plea offers to a criminal defendant as part of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Missouri v. Frye
Target entity description: Missouri v. Frye is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defense counsel has a duty to communicate formal plea offers to a criminal defendant as part of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
  • A. Missouri v. Seibert
    Missouri v. Seibert is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited police use of "question-first, warn-later" interrogation tactics by strengthening Miranda protections for suspects.
  • B. Missouri v. McNeely
    Missouri v. McNeely is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourth Amendment generally requires a warrant for nonconsensual blood draws in drunk-driving investigations, rejecting a per se rule based on the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream.
  • C. Cummings v. Missouri
    Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
  • D. Adair v. United States
    Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
  • E. Moore v. Illinois
    Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e21a02172c8190978f7951ccd80928 completed April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 completed May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69ffec4898088190bed531e33418c7e5 completed May 10, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69ffecce96508190a53f100e3207ebac completed May 10, 2026, 2:26 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.