Triple
T16102005
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Donald B. Verrilli Jr. |
E390641
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Defense of the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell |
E89330
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Defense of the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell | Statement: [Donald B. Verrilli Jr., notableWork, Defense of the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Defense of the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell Context triple: [Donald B. Verrilli Jr., notableWork, Defense of the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell]
-
A.
King v. Burwell
chosen
King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
-
B.
NFIB v. Sebelius
NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
-
C.
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services is a landmark federal court case in which the District of Massachusetts struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional for denying federal recognition and benefits to same-sex marriages recognized by the state.
-
D.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
-
E.
Gonzales v. Carhart
Gonzales v. Carhart is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, marking a significant shift in abortion jurisprudence by allowing broader government regulation of certain abortion procedures.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff68686481909517eed4266729ca |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fff29f9f2881909b96860ee23d8ada |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.