Triple

T16101783
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Colorado Amendment 2 E390636 entity
Predicate hasLegalCitation P4420 FINISHED
Object Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 E90996 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 | Statement: [Colorado Amendment 2, hasLegalCitation, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620
Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2, hasLegalCitation, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620]
  • A. Romer v. Evans chosen
    Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Arizona v. Evans
    Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
  • C. Gooding v. Wilson
    Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
  • D. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • E. Eisenstadt v. Baird
    Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e1ff68686481909517eed4266729ca completed April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fff29f9f2881909b96860ee23d8ada completed May 10, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.