Triple
T16101782
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado Amendment 2 |
E390636
|
entity |
| Predicate | describedBySource |
P519
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) |
E90996
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) | Statement: [Colorado Amendment 2, describedBySource, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2, describedBySource, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996)]
-
A.
Romer v. Evans
chosen
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
B.
Arizona v. Evans
Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
-
C.
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a local hate-speech ordinance as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff68686481909517eed4266729ca |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffeba007c08190bf4d3cf092abc7dd |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.