Triple
T16085680
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana state nature preserves |
E390221
|
entity |
| Predicate | managementActivities |
P25513
|
FINISHED |
| Object | invasive species control |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: invasive species control | Statement: [Indiana state nature preserves, managementActivities, invasive species control]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managementActivities Context triple: [Indiana state nature preserves, managementActivities, invasive species control]
-
A.
managementIs
Indicates that one entity holds a managerial role, responsibility, or authority over another entity.
-
B.
managementController
Indicates that one entity serves as the management controller responsible for overseeing, configuring, or administering another entity.
-
C.
manageThrough
Indicates that one entity exercises control, direction, or administration over another entity or process by means of an intermediary entity, channel, or mechanism.
-
D.
managedAct
chosen
Indicates that one entity oversaw, directed, or was responsible for carrying out a particular action or activity.
-
E.
managementNeed
Indicates that one entity requires oversight, direction, or administrative control from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff63edb0819092cbb671967bbdcd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1827ad7c88190b867da511cbfb7fa |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m.