Triple
T16078728
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Lipman |
E390042
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalProceeding |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) |
E56207
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) | Statement: [Samuel Lipman, legalProceeding, Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) Context triple: [Samuel Lipman, legalProceeding, Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919)]
-
A.
Abrams v. United States
chosen
Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
-
B.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
C.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
D.
Adair v. United States
Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
-
E.
Armstrong v. United States
Armstrong v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that forms part of the Insular Cases, addressing the constitutional rights and legal status of territories acquired by the United States.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86daf32ec8190a8c0466c8f49c3c0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e183c401a881908fcb0b753d2dfc8a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffeb917b008190b1680b347cfa0892 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:57 a.m.