Triple
T160773
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court Chamber |
E3279
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservedAs |
P2249
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historic site |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historic site | Statement: [Supreme Court Chamber, preservedAs, historic site]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservedAs Context triple: [Supreme Court Chamber, preservedAs, historic site]
-
A.
preservedAt
chosen
Indicates that something is kept, maintained, or conserved in a particular place or context.
-
B.
reconstructedAs
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, recreated, or inferred based on evidence, models, or partial information from another entity.
-
C.
reserves
Indicates that an entity has arranged in advance to hold or secure something for future use or access.
-
D.
historicallyBorneBy
Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
-
E.
presentedBy
Indicates that something (such as an event, performance, or work) is formally organized, hosted, or introduced by a particular person or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2527757ec819090b8becb2cf1a862 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25856d934819095460b2ea566eb6b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256623704819089d9eeefe05858ce |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.