Triple
T16076045
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dënesųłiné |
E389981
|
entity |
| Predicate | subgroupOf |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dene |
E21982
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dene | Statement: [Dënesųłiné, subgroupOf, Dene]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dene Context triple: [Dënesųłiné, subgroupOf, Dene]
-
A.
Dene
chosen
The Dene are a group of First Nations peoples of the subarctic regions of Canada, known for their Athabaskan languages, deep land-based traditions, and long-standing presence across the northern interior.
-
B.
Dene Zhatıé
Dene Zhatıé is an Athabaskan Indigenous language spoken by the South Slavey Dene people of Canada’s Northwest Territories.
-
C.
Dene Nation
The Dene Nation is a political and advocacy organization representing the interests, rights, and self-determination of Dene peoples in Canada’s Northwest Territories.
-
D.
Nlaka'pamux
The Nlaka'pamux are an Indigenous First Nations people of the Interior of British Columbia, Canada, whose traditional territory includes the Fraser Canyon region.
-
E.
Gwich’in
Gwich’in is an Athabaskan Indigenous language spoken by the Gwich’in people of northern Alaska and northwestern Canada.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86daf32ec8190a8c0466c8f49c3c0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e183c27aac81909c56d200c0c51a0c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffe48715e48190a493d1e373dc7c5f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:57 a.m.