Triple

T15993739
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tate & Lyle E387904 entity
Predicate formerlyInvolvedIn P12970 FINISHED
Object sugar refining LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sugar refining | Statement: [Tate & Lyle, formerlyInvolvedIn, sugar refining]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerlyInvolvedIn
Context triple: [Tate & Lyle, formerlyInvolvedIn, sugar refining]
  • A. formerlyInvolved chosen
    Indicates that an entity previously participated in or was associated with another entity or activity, but is no longer involved.
  • B. hasBeenInvolvedIn
    Indicates that an entity has participated in, taken part in, or been connected to a particular event, activity, or situation.
  • C. oftenInvolvedWith
    Indicates that one entity frequently participates in or is commonly associated with activities, events, or situations involving another entity.
  • D. mayBeInvolvedIn
    Indicates that an entity has a possible, but not certain, participation or role in a particular event, activity, or situation.
  • E. hasMemberInvolvedIn
    Indicates that a group or collective entity has at least one of its members participating in or engaged with a specified activity, event, or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86daa562c81908aacc179c0fe8fb5 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e17d4e871c819082d7b1c1eaf5b4fe completed April 17, 2026, 12:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e142d9d8e881909b559a3e3ca21d24 completed April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.