Triple
T15959250
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James Halliday |
E387013
|
entity |
| Predicate | goalOfContest |
P46673
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Find a worthy successor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Find a worthy successor | Statement: [James Halliday, goalOfContest, Find a worthy successor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: goalOfContest Context triple: [James Halliday, goalOfContest, Find a worthy successor]
-
A.
competitionGoal
chosen
Indicates that one entity’s objective or desired outcome is defined in the context of a competition involving another entity.
-
B.
goalIn
Indicates that one entity’s objective, aim, or intended outcome is located within, directed toward, or achieved inside another entity or context.
-
C.
goalType
Indicates the specific category or nature of a goal associated with an entity or action.
-
D.
goalsFor
Indicates the number of goals scored by one participant or team in favor of a particular side or match context.
-
E.
goalOfSide1
Indicates that the specified entity represents the objective or intended outcome pursued by the first side/party in a two-sided interaction or conflict.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da882448190a82ea962fe343b79 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e173b3bf6c81909230170e833d7ce7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142d6fb588190b4176eab4bbae774 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:53 a.m.